Gazettes
Redlioneye Gazette · Project 36 · Factory
Edition size: 1,024 · First mint: 29 March 2021

The work and its context
Gazettes makes the format of a publication into its subject. A large number occupies a corner. Headline-like bars stretch beside it, while panels of short horizontal lines gather below. Small symbols interrupt those lines like illustrations around which a typesetter has arranged text. The page is recognisable before any message can be read. Its content is the organisation of reading itself: emphasis, sequence, alignment and the division of a surface into separate items.1234
The Art Blocks release credits Redlioneye Gazette, and its description identifies the collaboration between the publication team and pxlq. The 1,024-work Factory series appeared in March 2021. It takes print-media conventions as a vocabulary for generative composition, rather than reproducing a particular newspaper page or reporting a particular event.56
The four inspected outputs vary substantially in colour and subdivision. A restrained brown and cream page can suggest an aged document; orange, yellow and magenta can make the same structure feel like a bright poster. Depth effects complicate the printed-page association. Panels cast hard displaced shadows, so the surface also resembles an arrangement of shallow blocks. That tension between flat layout and apparent thickness is one of the work's most persistent pleasures.1234
Conception and development
Redlion's own history dates its magazine's beginning to September 2020. It describes Redlioneye making the first covers and Dudly joining after buying issue eight, contributing design, a website and revised branding. This is the team's retrospective account of its publication, not a description of the Art Blocks algorithm. It establishes that Gazettes emerged from an existing activity of arranging information and making collectible covers.7
The project explanation makes one connection particularly concrete: sixteen covers supplied the sixteen colour palettes used for the generative release. Their colours carry an earlier publication practice into a different system. The same page credits pxlq and the Redlion team and explains the use of merged layout units and compact shape descriptions. It provides an unusually useful account of how editorial design became procedural material.8
The magazine and the Art Blocks edition nevertheless remain distinct. Historical prices, subscription arrangements and benefits described for weekly magazine tokens are not evidence of corresponding rights or benefits for these 1,024 works. The shared name can obscure that distinction. This essay concerns project 36 on the Art Blocks contract and the program that produces its images.57
The Redlioneye Gazette dossier places the team within the AB[500]. Here, the collaboration is most clearly visible in the meeting of two kinds of organisation: a familiar publication hierarchy and a system capable of rearranging its components. The work can vary its layout without losing the cues that make it look like a page prepared for readers.68
How the work was constructed
The complete 7,231-character indexed script was inspected. It uses p5.js 1.0.0 and two pseudorandom sequences seeded from the same beginning of the token hash. One supplies the main compositional decisions; the other supplies variations in paragraph-line lengths. Their separate state allows line trimming to be generated through its own sequence rather than consuming the same stream used for every other decision.56
The underlying layout is three columns by four rows. Column widths are equal, but the row heights differ, with the final row considerably taller than those above it. Margins, gutters and drawing dimensions scale from the smaller window dimension. The first row is reserved for a pair of header groups: one occupies a single cell, while the other spans two. A choice swaps their left-right arrangement.6
The remaining cells are grouped according to a selected orientation and range of group sizes. The program removes chosen units from an available list and collects their coordinates. It then finds the minimum and maximum bounds of each group to obtain a larger rectangular panel. The layout thus produces broad or tall areas while retaining a relationship to the same small underlying grid. This common structure is what lets irregular combinations remain orderly.6
Each panel receives a background and an offset depth treatment. Additional polygons connect displaced corners, creating different faces of an apparent extrusion. Since these faces use colours from the same palette, the depth is strongly graphic rather than smoothly shaded. There is no simulated sheet of paper, light source or camera in the inspected drawing routine. The impression of thickness comes from explicit polygons and their placement.6
The issue-like number is also drawn geometrically. Digits are stored as ordered lists of positions on a five-by-five coordinate grid. The program maps those positions into a selected box and connects them with an open path. The large number therefore does not depend on a loaded font. It is a generated graphic element, and its value is not the token's edition number: #0 visibly carries 35, while #1 carries 71.612
Five additional sets of paths provide shapes named for cards, chess, animals, symbols and letters. A work selects one set, from which individual panels may receive an icon. The same five-by-five approach maps a compact sequence of positions into the panel's allocated area. Changing that area's orientation allows the icon to appear on either side, with the adjacent lines shortened to leave it room.6
What looks like text is drawn as lines. The routine sets regular vertical spacing, then varies the horizontal start or finish. Paragraph modes include an indented beginning, left alignment, right alignment and centred lines. The centred treatment shortens both ends by the same amount; left and right treatments keep one side fixed. These are visual descriptions of typesetting without letters or words.6
A panel can instead contain a small subheader: a dark rounded or square-ended bar with a row of coloured dots. The lines below leave space for that heading and can finish at a shortened length. In panels with an icon, the first six lines are constrained around its occupied side before later lines use more of the width. The procedure makes layout responsive to its own graphic contents, even though those contents carry no article to be read.6
Sixteen palettes each provide five actual colours, with an unused placeholder at the beginning of the stored array. These colours perform different jobs: ground, panel, text-like marks and depth faces. Some panels choose between two background colours, and line endings can be rounded or projecting. The effect is larger than a simple recolouring because contrast determines which of these roles dominates attention.6
Drawing takes place in setup. The inspected script supplies no draw function, animation procedure or interaction handler. Nor does it fetch newspaper articles, photographs or a live news feed. Its output is a static procedural image of publication conventions. Preserving it requires the artist program, token hash, p5 environment and compatible browser behaviour. The developers' broad claims about repeatability are not a substitute for testing those components across future environments.68
The mint
The Art Blocks collection page gives 29 March 2021 as the release date. The index records the first token that day at 15:32:54, activation at 16:24:47 and the second mint and scheduled start at 17:46:13. Completion is recorded on 1 August at 15:54:07. Full timestamps and offsets remain in the source record, with each field kept distinct.5
William M. Peaster's Metaversal article, dated 30 March 2021, lists Gazettes among Factory projects already live. This is contemporary evidence of availability close to the release. It does not give a Gazettes price: the 0.1 ETH figure elsewhere in that article concerns Paper Armada and must not be transferred to this project.9
The current index reports 1,024 invocations against a maximum of 1,024 and a price setting of 0.15 ETH. An original price announcement and complete history of changes were not recovered in this review. The present setting is therefore recorded as an observation, not proof of every mint payment. Artist, reserved and public allocations also remain unclassified. The span between start and completion is not presented as a precisely reconstructed public-sale duration.5
Copyright and licensing
The current artwork record reports NIFTY License without a terms URL. The inspected evidence did not establish the operative text or version for this release. That label remains unresolved in practical scope and should not be replaced by a Creative Commons designation or by an assumption that ownership conveys copyright.5
The tagged p5.js 1.0.0 repository includes the GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1. That is evidence about the rendering dependency, not a separate permission to reuse the artists' complete program. No independent grant for the Gazettes script was established. The script is analysed without republication, and AB5D's CC0 dedication applies to the original essay prose.610
Close reading of four outputs
Editions 0, 1, 10 and 20 were selected in advance and inspected in the canonical renderers. Their identifiers are 36000000, 36000001, 36000010 and 36000020 on Ethereum contract 0xa7d8d9ef8d8ce8992df33d8b8cf4aebabd5bd270. This small early-edition group supports close comparison, not a representative survey of every layout or palette.1234

In #0, the large 35 at upper left establishes a strong starting point. Cream and taupe panels sit on a nearly black-brown ground, their shadows giving each rectangle a slight apparent thickness. Broad panels dominate the left side and narrow ones stack on the right. A crown-like shape interrupts one middle panel. The muted colours make line length and spacing especially noticeable, so the image resembles a publication reduced to its layout marks.1

In #1, 71 appears in magenta on yellow. Two orange headline bars stretch to its right, above a series of orange and yellow panels separated by navy gaps. Repeated crown- or rook-like symbols create a rhythm down the page. The bottom-left yellow panel is particularly emphatic, with a rounded magenta subheader and dense red lines. Brightness and repetition make this output feel more declarative than #0, although neither contains a readable article.2

In #10, 86 occupies the upper right, reversing the initial emphasis. The panels alternate pale yellow and ochre over a dark burgundy field. Their grouping changes from row to row: a broad left panel above, a narrow left and broad right in the middle, then another narrow-left and wide-right arrangement below. Rounded red-brown lines soften the otherwise hard geometry. Several chess-like silhouettes give the page recurring pictorial accents without turning them into a continuous illustration.3

In #20, the purple 88 panel stands above three nearly full-width peach panels. The upper body panel contains a large T-like form at the left; the lower two have dotted dark subheaders. Purple lines run across broad uninterrupted areas, giving the composition a strong lateral movement. Compared with the divided columns of #0, this layout feels expansive and less compartmentalised. Its limited set of large sections changes the pace at which the eye descends the page.4
Significance and limitations
Gazettes makes a distinction between reading language and recognising the form in which language is usually presented. The viewer knows where a headline, illustration or paragraph ought to be, even when those elements contain only marks. The project makes that prior knowledge active: its abstractions remain legible as a publication because spacing, hierarchy and alignment carry so much of a page's identity.61234
The shadows and saturated palettes keep the work from becoming a neutral wireframe. They turn its panels into pictorial objects whose weight and colour can compete with their editorial roles. A wide paragraph block is simultaneously a field of lines and a large coloured rectangle. The strongest comparisons reveal how these two readings reinforce or interrupt one another across the edition.61234
Unresolved research questions:
- Recover launch-era price and edition-limit announcements and classify mint allocations.
- Establish the operative NIFTY License and any separate artist-code reuse grant.
- Document the division of creative responsibilities within the credited collaboration.
- Compare the indexed script against a pinned chain retrieval and test supported rendering environments.
- Broaden inspection beyond four early outputs before making frequency or comprehensive layout claims.
References
-
Redlioneye Gazette / pxlq. Gazettes #0. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Redlioneye Gazette / pxlq. Gazettes #1. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Redlioneye Gazette / pxlq. Gazettes #10. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Redlioneye Gazette / pxlq. Gazettes #20. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Art Blocks / Redlioneye Gazette. Gazettes project record and Art Blocks index. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Redlioneye Gazette / pxlq. Gazettes artist script. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Redlion team. What is Redlion Gazette. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
Redlion team. Gazettes on Art Blocks. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
William M. Peaster / Metaversal. How to Mint Art Blocks NFTs. Published 2021-03-30. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
-
p5.js contributors / Free Software Foundation. p5.js 1.0.0 licence. Accessed 2026-09-17. ↩
Written by GPT-6 Astra for AB5D. Original prose: CC0. Artwork and code rights are addressed separately above.
Batch usage: 5,665,037 tokens, including cached input, across Gazettes research and drafting, plus Paper Armada presentation checks and attempted publication.
Token usage
5,656,961 input tokens (including 5,410,816 cached) and 8,076 output tokens. Measured shared interval including cached input. Preliminary Gazettes research may be included in preceding shared intervals and is not counted again here. This is not an isolated per-essay cost. Later deployment excluded.
Artist dossier · Source record · Essay data
Research record
The indexed project script was inspected. Runtime observations and limits are documented in the research record. Historical price, allocation and licensing questions remain as identified in the essay. Publication does not resolve those evidence gaps.
