- Artist
- SAB & K2xL
- Raster
- raster.art/artist/sab-k2xl ↗
- Practice
- Collaborative generative art grounded in computational design, geometry, layering, and color.
- In the set
- Assemblage ↗ · 361 editions
- Links
- Full bibliography ↗
SAB and K2xL are represented in AB[500] by Assemblage, a collaborative Art Blocks project comprising exactly 361 editions. Contemporary market research places the collection among the generative projects released during the first half of 2022.1 The project also belongs to the wider Art Blocks context, a platform archive organized around generative art and categories including Factory, Curated, Studio, and Collaborations.2
The collaboration joins two authorial positions within one procedural framework. Public biographical documentation remains limited, so the clearest institutional point of entry is SAB's Art Blocks profile, which identifies SAB as a computational designer, academic, and digital artist.3 The same archive connects SAB with Spiromorphs, an earlier Art Blocks Factory project of 200 unique works released on December 10, 2021.4 That record establishes a practice concerned with encoded form before the collaborative appearance of Assemblage.
A field built from parts
The title invokes the art-historical idea of assemblage, but the project translates physical construction into a screen-based procedural language. The Hammer Museum defines assemblage as the creation of three-dimensional compositions from found objects, in which original components retain their references while acquiring new narrative meanings.5 The National Galleries of Scotland likewise characterizes it as art constructed from pre-existing materials and relates it to sculpture, collage, and installation.6 In SAB and K2xL's work, the operative materials are computational: shape, line, color, overlap, spacing, and repetition.
Across the six selected outputs, geometric elements appear accumulated rather than isolated. Dense regions meet open intervals, while strong colors give separate components enough autonomy to remain legible inside the larger composition. The series therefore stages a productive tension between module and totality. Each edition reads as a singular image, yet it also discloses the reusable visual vocabulary from which the image was assembled.
The title also invites comparison with collage, which Larousse describes as a compositional process joining heterogeneous fragments on a support. Its account traces collage through Cubism, Dada, Surrealism, Pop Art, and Nouveau Réalisme, emphasizing altered meanings produced through combination.7 Assemblage does not reproduce those material practices, but it places algorithmic composition in dialogue with them. Code becomes an organizing apparatus for positioning virtual components, allowing structure to emerge through repeated acts of combination.
2022, Assemblage
2022, Assemblage
2022, Assemblage
2022, Assemblage
2022, Assemblage
2022, Assemblage
Live on Art Blocks: assemblage-by-sab-and-k2xl ↗
Variation, infrastructure, and the edition
The edition format makes comparison central to viewing. Recurrent formal tendencies identify a common generator, while changes in density, hierarchy, and palette give every result its own balance. This is generative art understood not as one fixed composition but as a bounded population of outcomes. Research into evolutionary art similarly distinguishes algorithmic systems by the roles that variation, selection, and human intervention play in the creative process.8
The series is also inseparable from its technical substrate. An independent Ethereum data explorer identifies the contract associated with the supplied Art Blocks renders as GenArt721Core and labels its owner Artblocks.9 Etherscan's documentation explains that contract-address queries can retrieve project details for ERC-721 and other token standards.10 These records do not explain the artists' particular algorithm, but they clarify the programmable and blockchain-indexed environment in which the edition exists.
Seen together, the 361 editions of Assemblage present collaboration as both subject and method. Individual visual components collaborate inside each image, while two artists collaborate through a single system. The result is an image practice in which cohesion is achieved without suppressing difference.
Bibliography
The references cited in this essay are listed below. For the complete bibliography see the SAB & K2xL links page ↗.